Journalist’s Column on Pakistan Army Chief Sparks Denial, Political Storm

Journalist’s Column on Pakistan Army Chief Sparks Denial, Political Storm

Military says no interview or mention of Imran Khan took place. Writer insists he was misinterpreted.


Field Marshal Asim Munir. Photo: [https://www.dawn.com/news/1931280]
Field Marshal Asim Munir

A Column That Struck a Nerve

When veteran Pakistani journalist Suhail Warraich described his “first meeting” with Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir in a recent column, he could hardly have predicted the uproar that followed.

Published on Aug. 16 in Jang, Pakistan’s largest Urdu-language daily, the piece recounted remarks at a Brussels event. Warraich wrote that the army chief emphasized reconciliation in politics and illustrated the point by reciting Qur’anic verses on repentance. He did not specify a political addressee — a gap that quickly fed speculation.

Journalist Suhail Warraich (right) attends an event in Brussels where Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir (middle) was present.

The Military’s Firm Denial

Days later, the military’s public relations chief, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, moved to contain the uproar. Briefing reporters in Islamabad, he said the army chief had granted no interview in Brussels, made no mention of Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), and spoke of neither apologies nor amnesty.

“Cases of May 9 must go through legal process. There is no question of blanket pardons.”

— Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry

Warraich Pushes Back

Facing criticism from both the military and PTI supporters, Warraich argued that the denial refuted claims he never made. He said his column mentioned neither an interview nor PTI nor amnesty — only that the army chief cited Qur’anic verses on reconciliation.

“In my column, there was no interview, no mention of PTI, no talk of amnesty. I only recorded that the Field Marshal recited Qur’anic verses about reconciliation.”

— Suhail Warraich, on X

Original post on X:

Political Fallout and Accusations

PTI demanded an official clarification, warning that ambiguity would erode public trust. Party figure Zulfi Bukhari accused Warraich of fueling rumors about threats to Mr. Khan’s life — a charge his supporters amplified online.

Zulfi Bukhari

A Wider Debate on Credibility

The episode split opinion in Pakistan’s media sphere. Columnist Arifa Noor faulted the army’s delayed response, while journalist Matiullah Jan criticized Warraich’s one-sided account yet said he still found the columnist more credible than the military’s media wing.

The Bigger Picture

The uproar underscores Pakistan’s fragile political environment, where even oblique remarks attributed to the army chief can trigger denials, partisan outrage, and a broader argument about whose narrative prevails — the press or the generals.

References

BBC Urdu original report:

https://www.bbc.com/urdu/articles/c9qyd173374o

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply